Designing and Building the Vermonster Mini
Dual-Resonant Solid State Tesla Coil

Design

Designing and building a Tesla coil can be a very exciting and rewarding project that can be very educational as well. Whether the builder is a student interested in putting their classwork to a real-world use, or an experienced DRSSTC designer interested in making a bigger or better coil than they ever have before, it is a good way to exercise and improve one’s knowledge and understanding of low voltage circuit design, high power electronics, mathematics, and physics. This document is written not only to follow the design and build of my own Dual-Resonant Solid-State Tesla coil, which I have dubbed the “Vermonster Mini”, but also to provide some general information and instruction for other hobbyists and engineers who are interested in building their own.

Tesla Coil Basics

Before I start documenting my build, I feel I should give a bit of background on what a Tesla coil is, in case you don’t know. The Tesla Coil was invented by an electrical engineer named Nikola Tesla around 1891 as a device to transmit electricity wirelessly over large distances. It is an air-cored resonant transformer capable of achieving extremely high output voltages at high frequencies. A Tesla coil differs from basic iron-cored transformers in that the turn ratio between the primary and secondary does not have as much of an effect on the secondary voltage as it does in standard transformers. Instead, a Tesla coil relies on having two tuned resonant circuits – one made up of the primary coil (an inductor) and tank capacitor and the other made up of the secondary coil (another inductor) and topload (a capacitor). When the two circuits are in tune (meaning they both have the same resonant frequency and are oscillating naturally), you get what is referred to as “resonant rise”. When an alternating current is applied to the primary LC circuit it becomes excited and begins to oscillate at its resonant frequency. This, in turn, induces an alternating current in the secondary LC circuit. This starts an oscillation in the secondary and, if the primary circuit is properly in tune, every cycle will induce even more current in the secondary which adds to the amplitude of the existing waveform. This will happen every cycle, and each time it happens the amplitude of the voltage seen on the secondary increases. One of the most common analogies I have seen is a child’s swing: You push the child with a certain force, and he’ll go up to a certain height. Then when he swings back and you push him again with the same force at just the right time, the force you apply and the force of him moving forward again will add, and he’ll go even higher. With a Tesla coil, this increase in energy happens tens or hundreds of thousands of times per second, and every time the secondary is excited by the primary, the voltage at the topload increases. Eventually, the voltage becomes so high that the surrounding air is ionized and an arc is created.

A traditional Tesla coil uses a high voltage transformer and a spark gap to send current through the tank circuit in order to excite the secondary. The schematic for a basic Spark Gap Tesla Coil (SGTC) is shown in figure 1:

As you can see, when the spark gap conducts it acts like a switch and creates a parallel LC circuit, which oscillates at its resonant frequency and excites the secondary coil.

Another type of Tesla coil is the Dual-Resonant Solid State Tesla Coil (DRSSTC), which runs on the same principle except for one major difference: instead of using a spark gap to switch current into the tank circuit, we use solid-state devices, namely high-power transistors. Unlike spark gaps, transistors do not require high voltage (6+ kilovolts) to conduct, so solid state Tesla coils can run at much lower input voltages. Most DRSSTCs run off of rectified mains (120VAC/170VDC or 240VAC/340VDC), which makes them ideal for small, portable, or lightweight projects. They don’t require hefty transformers or thick insulation on all conductors, unlike Spark Gap Tesla Coils.

As opposed to a basic solid-state Tesla coil (SSTC) which simply switches current into the primary coil at the resonant frequency of the secondary (no primary resonant circuit), a DRSSTC has a resonant primary tank circuit that more closely mimics how a classic SGTC operates. The double tuned resonant circuits greatly increase the power throughput from the primary circuit to the secondary, making the DRSSTC much more efficient (and thus, generate a much more spectacular output) than a standard SSTC.

Unfortunately, building a DRSSTC is not a simple task. You cannot simply replace a spark gap with a transistor. There are a lot of calculations that go into the design, as well as lots of research and extra circuitry. Now that you (hopefully) have a better idea of the different types of Tesla Coils and the general theory of operation, we can move onto the secondary coil design.

Secondary Coil Design

In this section I will begin to discuss the design process. DRSSTCs require a fair amount of math before one can even begin considering building their own. The math is fairly straightforward; it is mostly "plug-and-play" using the different formulas. I recommend starting with the secondary coil and working your way backwards because the secondary coil is one of the most difficult parts to change once it has been built.

For this project I decided I wanted to keep the coil relatively small. I knew I had some 4-inch ID (4.5-inch OD) white PVC pipe readily available, so this was where I started. Most DRSSTCs have a secondary diameter-to-height ratio of 1:3 or 1:4, but I wanted to keep my secondary around 12 inches tall. This is a little lower than the standard ratio but it should be acceptable. I also knew I wanted to use #34 AWG enameled copper wire for my secondary coil because it is cheap, easy to obtain, and will give me roughly the number of turns I'm looking for on the 12 inch long form. I plan to use a 4-inch diameter dryer duct bent into a donut shape for the topload because this is one of the cheapest methods and is tried and true. The topload provides some capacitance with respect to ground, which is what makes the secondary circuit a resonant LC circuit; along with the primary coil (an inductor), the secondary coil oscillates at its resonant frequency. For the first step in designing a DRSSTC, I would recommend deciding on your secondary specifications: height, diameter, wire gauge, and topload. From there you can calculate the resonant frequency, which you will need for the rest of your coil design.

In order to calculate the resonant frequency of a standard LC circuit, one would use the following formula:

where f is the resonant frequency, L is the inductance, and C is the capacitance. However, at high frequencies like what we would expect to see on a Tesla coil, it’s not quite this simple. The surrounding environment, the parasitic capacitance of the secondary coil windings, and lead length can all significantly change the resonant frequency. Therefore, I strongly recommend a program called “JavaTC” to help you determine your coil’s specifications. Based on Paul Nicholson’s GEOTC software, JavaTC was developed by Bart Anderson to help Tesla coil designers determine, with reasonable accuracy, various numbers and helpful information regarding their coil’s operation. You can use or download JavaTC here:

http://www.classictesla.com/java/javatc3d/javatc3d.html

Figure 2 shows the blank form on JavaTC that is used to enter the information for the Tesla coil:

At this point all we are going to worry about is the secondary circuit information, namely the coil radius, height, number of turns, wire gauge, and topload data. The other calculations for the primary tank circuit will follow.

Using the information mentioned above, I am going to go ahead and plug it into JavaTC and see what it gives me:

• Secondary radius 1: 2.25” (the PVC pipe is 4” ID with ¼” walls, so the total diameter is 4.5”. This gives me a radius of 2.25”).

• Secondary radius 2: Same as radius 1.

• Height 1: This is how high off the ground the bottom of your secondary sits. I will have mine set up on a stand that is 24” tall. Therefore, the height off the ground is 24”.

• Height 2: The coil will be 12” tall, so 24” + 12” = 36”.

• Since I haven’t wound the coil yet, I don’t have the number of turns and will need to calculate it. I know that I I'm using #34 AWG wire, which has a bare wire diameter of 0.0063 inches plus 0.0007 inch thick enamel (JavaTC has a wire diameter calculator, which I used to obtain these values), giving me a total wire diameter of 0.007 inches. Therefore, I can calculate the number of turns by dividing 12 inches by 0.007 (the width of each turn), which comes out to about 1558 turns.

• Again, the wire gauge is #34, or 0.007 inches in diameter

• My topload is a toroid (donut) shape. The minor diameter is the diameter of the tubing. In my case it’s 4 inches.

• The major diameter is the overall outer diameter of the donut shape. Mine came out to be 15.75 inches.

• The toroid center height is right in the vertical center of the toroid. Since the toroid is 4” tall (determined by the minor diameter), then the center is at 2 inches. The bottom of my topload is level with the top of my secondary, so add this 2 inches to the height of the coil (36” + 2”) and you get 38 inches for the height. Make sure to click “add” to add the topload to the list. If you have more than one topload, then you can repeat this process and add your other ones. I don’t recommend large or multiple toroids for most small DRSSTCs though, as it can cause too much loading on the secondary circuit and you will risk arcing between the primary and secondary coils. This could destroy your secondary and potentially your driver circuitry as well.

These are the values that are specific to my coil. Every coil will be different. I plug these values into JavaTC and the output is shown in Figure 3:

At the top you can see the estimated resonant frequency – 128.79 kHz. Eventually this value changed to 127.04 kHz, however, because as I set up the coil I got more accurate measurements and redid the calculations. You will need this value to determine the specifications for your primary tank circuit.

Primary Circuit Design

In this section I will describe the process involved in designing a tank circuit to operate at the same resonant frequency as the secondary. Once again, I will be using JavaTC to do most of the work, though there are some things I’ll need to do myself first. JavaTC is really just a way to fine-tune your math and do the more complicated calculations.

Let’s start by deciding what capacitance will be convenient. I know this sounds a little careless and non-scientific, but I have found it to be the best first step. Since finding a suitable capacitor is so difficult, it’s really best to find one and tailor the primary coil to match (within reason, of course).

When picking out a capacitor for your DRSSTC, there are several things you need to watch out for:

• Make sure they have a high pulse current. The tank capacitor can see several hundred to over a thousand amps, or more if you’re running continuous wave ('CW', which means no interrupter is used), so if the one you pick out can’t handle it, you might have a small bomb on your hands.

• Make sure it is rated for a voltage MUCH higher than your bus voltage (that is, the voltage you are applying to the bridge, which is generally rectified mains). Some experienced DRSSTC builders have recommended choosing a capacitor voltage that is roughly 30x higher than your supplied bus voltage. This is because the voltage on the primary can ramp up significantly during operation due to the LC resonant circuit.

• The capacitor should have a very low dissipation factor. The dissipation factor is the ratio between the power dissipated by the capacitor’s equivalent series resistance (ESR) and the power dissipated by the capacitor’s reactance. Otherwise, you will lose a lot of your energy in the capacitor, potentially damaging it and causing the Tesla coil to perform poorly.

• The capacitor must have a low ESR. A high ESR will lead to excessive internal heating within the capacitor which will cause it to degrade, and possibly even explode. Likewise, the equivalent series inductance should also be low.

• The best choices are polypropylene film/foil capacitors as they work best at high frequencies and have a low dissipation factor. I do not recommend ceramic types as they are generally not very good at Tesla Coil frequencies and will likely be damaged, regardless of their voltage ratings and capacitance.

The first thing I had to do before looking for capacitors was determine the voltage rating I’d need. I plan to supply 170VDC to the bridge (rectified 120VAC mains), so that means my capacitors should be rated for at least Vc = 170v * 30 = 5100 volts AC.

After searching for a while I found a distributor that was selling some MMKP 2uF 530VAC capacitors designed for IGBT snubber applications. Putting 16 of these capacitors in series gave me a voltage rating of 8480 volts AC, which is plenty for my setup. In general you'll want to get a capacitor bank that has the correct capacitance and the highest voltage rating possible. This setup of 16 capacitors in series gave me a total capacitance of 125nF, which is a very reasonable capacitance for a small DRSSTC. In order to determine what is reasonable you will need to work ahead a bit to figure out what your primary coil inductance would need to be to match the resonant frequency of the secondary coil and topload, and if the physical size of the primary coil would be practical. I probably would not exceed 20 turns on the primary because that would tend to be bulky and, since the outer coils are further away from the secondary, the efficiency would likely be lower as well. I generally recommend between 10 and 20 turns, though that is highly dependent of your particular setup. It is a good goal to aim for, however.

Now that I have a capacitor plan, I can design my primary coil based on the values I have. To get a general value for the primary inductance required to match the resonance of the secondary, I’m going to use the same formula that I mentioned in the Secondary Coil Design section:

Since I know the frequency of the secondary is 128.79 kHz, and I know the capacitance of the tank capacitor is 125nF, all I need to do is solve for L:

Plug in 125nF for C and 128.79 kHz for f and I get about 12.22uH. Therefore, in order for the primary to resonate at the same frequency as my secondary, my primary coil will have to have an inductance of about 12.22uH.

I’m not going to worry about this value too much at this point, as it can generally be “tuned” later on by “tapping” the coil at different points. All this means is that the outer connection to the primary coil can be moved around to different points to obtain different inductances. JavaTC will help take care of any discrepancies later on.

Now that we have a rough estimate of the primary circuit, we can plug it into JavaTC and see what we get. The values for the secondary will be the same as what I plugged in earlier. However, we now have the value for the primary capacitor and a value for primary coil inductance. Note that the primary capacitor is in uF, so I will have to enter 0.125uF instead of 125nF.

Now, the primary is a bit tricky here. Instead of asking for the primary coil inductance, it asks for the dimensions. Therefore, we’ll have to do a little math. I plan to use ¼” copper tubing for my primary with 1/8” spacing between each turn. Tubing with this diameter should be able to handle the high currents reasonably well, and it is fairly easy to obtain from just about any hardware store. 1/8" spacing between the turns means ¼" center-to-center distance from one turn to the next (remember the tubing is ¼" diameter as well). I also know that I would like a flat "pancake" primary coil (simply a flat spiral coil around the base of the secondary coil) to help prevent primary strikes. So the question now is, how many turns should the primary coil have? Once again, the number of turns can be adjusted later on by moving the tap point, but getting a general idea of the number of turns can be very helpful in setting up JavaTC. Knowing that I want to allow about half an inch between the innermost winding of the primary and the secondary (to help prevent arc-over), my primary must have a diameter of 5.5”, which means a radius of 2.75”.

Now the fun part: Calculating the number of turns. I’ll begin with the basic formula for calculating inductance of a flat pancake primary coil:

where L is the inductance in uH, N is the number of turns, D is the inner diameter in inches, S is the turn spacing in inches, and W is the wire (or tubing) diameter in inches. However, we want to solve for the number of turns (N), not the inductance (L), so we need to rearrange the formula. I’ll spare you the gory details and instead I have created an Excel file to approximate the required turn count. It can be downloaded from the following link:

Primary Turns Calculator

This spreadsheet was put together by a friend of mine to help me out with this problem. It turns out solving for “N” in the previous equation is not as easy as it sounds, and the formula becomes very complex. We determined that a lookup table was the best method for estimating the number of turns required to obtain a given inductance.

Using the Excel sheet I enter 0.125 for S (that is 1/8 inch spacing between the turns. Note this is not a center-to-center measurement between the windings, but the minimum distance between them), 0.25 for W (this is the diameter of the tubing I am using), 5.5 for D (this is the diameter of the innermost winding), and 12.22 (this is the target inductance in microhenrys in order for the primary tank circuit’s resonant frequency to match that of the secondary, which I got from JavaTC earlier). In the end, I got N = 6.74 turns.

Now that I have this number, I have a general idea of what to plug into JavaTC. Below are the values I will be using (which we have determined):

• Radius 1: 2.75”

• Radius 2: 5.275” (half of Do, calculated by the spreadsheet)

• Height 1: 24.125” (this is the height of the stand, 24”, plus half the diameter of the primary since we’re measuring to the center)

• Height 2: Same as Height 1

• Turns: 6.74 (calculated by the spreadsheet)

• Wire diameter: 0.25”

The input to JavaTC is shown in Figure 4 (don’t forget to put in the values for the secondary coil and topload again as well):

Before clicking the “RUN JAVATC” button I’m going to do a couple of things. First, I’m going to check the “Auto-Tune” box. This will take care of any error in the primary turns count. Second, I will tell it to automatically adjust the coupling to 0.13. Generally you do not want the coupling to be more than 0.2 for DRSSTCs, otherwise you risk arcing between the secondary and primary coils.

When I run the program, I get the output shown in Figure 5:

As you can see, the resonant frequency of the primary and that of the secondary match perfectly, which is what we were aiming for. Also, because we checked the “Auto-tune” box, if you look back up to the inputs, JavaTC adjusted the turns count for the primary to obtain this precise resonant frequency, and the height of the primary to set the coupling. This can be seen in Figure 6.

So we were fairly close in our estimate of 6.4 turns.

At this point I think it’s fair to say we have completed the design for the primary and secondary tank circuits. We have the specifications of both circuits, such as the resonant frequencies, inductance, coupling coefficient, length of the wire, and so on. Now that we have designed the actual Tesla coil itself, it’s time to start thinking about how we’re going to drive it. In the next section we’ll take a look at the schematic and I’ll walk through the theory of operation.

Schematic

My schematic is based on Steve Ward’s Universal DRSSTC Driver 2.0, though I have made a few changes to meet my own needs. Most of the credit for this design goes to him, though, as his schematic greatly influenced my own. Figure 7 shows the overall schematic for my DRSSTC:

Pretty confusing, huh? I think so too. So let’s break it down into its key pieces.

1. The Interrupter
I didn’t include this in the schematic because there is any number of different ways to interrupt the coil. Generally, depending on your coil, you don’t want the on-time (the amount of time your input signal is HIGH, and thus, the amount of time your coil is switched on during each high-frequency cycle) to exceed 100uS (though some coils can handle this without a problem), and generally want the duty cycle to remain around 5% or lower. A longer on-time and duty cycle will allow excessive current to flow through your IGBTs and capacitor bank, which could lead to heating and damage to your coil. The link below is for downloading a calculator program written by Sigurthr (a member at 4hv.org). If you enter your coil’s information (bus voltage, primary tank cap voltage rating, primary coil inductance, and resonant frequency) it will tell you your maximum tank current, as well as the maximum allowed pulse width in order to protect your primary capacitor.

Sigurthr's DRSSTC Calculator

Possible interrupter ideas range from simple single 555 timer circuits, to more complex multiple 555 timer designs, to TL494 PWM circuits, and even to microcontroller-based interrupters. Regardless of the interrupter, however, there is one thing you should pay close attention to, and that is the electrical isolation between the interrupter and the driver circuitry. In the overall schematic this is represented by an optocoupler (which is shown enlarged in Figure 8), but in real life should probably consist of a fiber-optic transmitter, cable, and receiver to help isolate the operator from any high voltage strikes.

2. Soft-Switching Circuitry
“Soft-switching” means that we’re only going to turn off our IGBTs at the zero-crossing point of the current. Trying to turn off IGBTs when there are hundreds of amps flowing through them puts a lot of stress on them and can cause them to fail rather quickly. Soft-switching only allows them to turn off when there is little or no current flowing through them. One of the most popular ways to do this is using a flip-flop, and in my case I use the TI SN74HC109 positive edge-triggered JK flip-flop. You’ll notice a resistor and a capacitor located between IC1A and IC1B forming an RC delay (R9 and C4). The purpose of this delay is to ensure that the current through the IGBTs is fully switched off before the preset (“PRE”) pin of the flip-flop is pulled low (which, since we’re tapping off the /Q output, means turning off the driver chips). Steve Ward explains in his “General Guide to DRSSTC Design” (http://www.stevehv.4hv.org/drsstc_design.htm) that the RC time constant should be greater than 1.5*P, where P is the period of your tank circuit. He also suggests that, to be on the safe side, you could even use a time constant of 3*P. For my coil, my calculated resonant frequency is 127.04 kHz, or 127,040 Hz. Therefore, the period (1/f) is 0.00000787 seconds (7.87 uS), so I would want my time constant to be between 11.81 uS and 23.61 uS. I chose an arbitrary capacitor value of 1nF since I had several of them readily available, so based on the formula for an RC time constant, τ=R*C, I would need a resistance of at least 11,810 ohms for 1.5*P, or 23,610 ohms for the 3*P figure. I chose 24k because it is the closest common resistor value to the calculated 23.61k ohm figure. It is ok to go a little bit over, but try not to exceed this 3*P value too much. It is best to aim for the closest common resistor value.

This circuit also incorporates the over-current detection (OCD) signal to turn off the driver chips when the current exceeds a set point (more on this later) and the feedback signal which acts as a clock for the flip-flop. This is shown in Figure 9.

3. Driver Chips
The driver chips are simply two paralleled Microchip MCP14E5 4.0A Dual MOSFET drivers with enable pins and one inverting and one non-inverting output. The schematic shows Texas Instruments UCC27425 chips, which have the same pinout and operate the same as the Microchip parts. These were the devices I originally planned to use but their maximum drive voltage was only 15V, which may not be able to drive the GDTs hard enough to switch the IGBTs in a reasonable amount of time. According to the IGBT datasheets, higher gate voltages allow faster switching. I eventually selected the MCP14E5 chips because they have a drive voltage of 18V, which means they may be more reliable than the TI parts at switching the IGBTs quickly.

As mentioned before, each of these devices contains one inverting and one non-inverting driver. This circuit takes advantage of this configuration to provide a bipolar square wave between the two outputs which is required to switch the IGBTs.

Not shown in the schematic are four capacitors (two for each driver chip). These capacitors are connected between the 15V rail and GND as close to the driver chips as possible. Each chip has one 0.1uF capacitor for decoupling purposes, and one 10uF capacitor to act as a reservoir to quickly provide the current necessary for charging the IGBT gate capacitance to ensure fast switch-on time. 10uF is probably overkill; 1uF probably would have been more than enough.

Connecting two driver chips together in parallel will hopefully allow the load to be shared more evenly and allow higher drive current for the GDTs. This configuration can be seen in Figure 10.

You’ll notice on the output that I have a capacitor in parallel with a resistor on one of the outputs, in series with the GDT primaries. I eventually added a second capacitor (0.01uF) in series with the resistor and connected the smaller capacitor and resistor across the 1uF capacitor. The idea was that the 1uF capacitor would block any DC, which could cause the GDTs and IGBTs to latch up and cause excessive heating. However, this capacitor is in the same loop as an inductor (the primary coil of the GDTs), which will cause “ringing” (unwanted oscillations). In order to avoid this, I added a 10 ohm resistor in parallel to damp these oscillations. In the case of latch-up, though, this 10 ohm resistor would pass current, heating up and burning in the process. This actually happened to me once, which is why I added the 0.01uF capacitor in series with the resistor. This allows the resistor to damp the oscillations caused by the capacitors and the GDT primary, but the DC is still blocked by the capacitors.

4. GDTs
The “Gate Drive Transformer”, or “GDT” for short, is used to drive the gates of the IGBTs. It serves as an isolation transformer and, depending on the turns ratio, can also allow the gates of the IGBTs to be driven at a higher voltage than the driver chips supply, speeding up the switching. In this schematic I use two cores because I will have two parallel H-bridges to better handle the current load. It will depend on how your IGBTs are laid out whether you’ll want to use one GDT or two. Figure 11 shows how the GDTs are connected on my coil.

Notice that there are two pairs of secondaries, one pair on each of the cores (L5 & L6, and L7 & L8). The phasing of each transformer is identical, but the two secondaries on each core are out of phase with each other. This is because of how an H-bridge works; when one IGBT is on, its complement must be off. In other words, if the high-side transistor is on, the low-side transistor must be off. By connecting the out-of-phase secondaries to complimentary IGBTs, it ensures that both of them are not on at the same time. This phase difference could also be handled by swapping the secondary connections to the IGBTs, which is what I did in my actual setup.

5. H-Bridge (or "Full-Bridge")
The H-bridge is what generates an alternating current from a steady DC bus. This AC signal (a high-voltage bipolar square wave) is important in order to excite your primary tank circuit. The 3300uF capacitor is for smoothing, since the input to the bridge will be rectified mains (120VAC in the US), and also acts as a reservoir to supply a large amount of current in a short amount of time. In order to find the DC bus voltage, simply multiply the RMS AC voltage (120V) by the square root of 2 (1.414), and that means my DC bus will be around 170V. However, a large smoothing capacitor will be very important, otherwise we will have significant 120Hz ripple (no smoothing) which will not excite the resonant circuit properly. This will lead to poor performance of the coil. Figure 12 shows the schematic of the H-bridge I used for my coil.

This part of the circuit will see a lot of power, so proper safety precautions must be taken. C10 is the main bus filter capacitor, which smooths the rectified mains voltage. C9 is a snubber capacitor. The purpose of this cap is to help minimize large inductive spikes caused when the IGBTs switch on or off. The 5-ohm (actually, 5.1 ohm) gate resistors help to minimize ringing on the IGBT gates, the transient voltage suppressor (TVS) diodes prevent spikes from damaging the IGBT gates and, potentially, the driver circuitry, and the 1N5819 diodes also help to protect the IGBTs from spikes. It is also important to note the use of anti-parallel diodes across the emitter and collector of each of the IGBTs. This also helps minimize large voltage spikes across the collectors and emitters of the IGBTs when they switch off. Whether the IGBT has a built-in body diode or not it is important to have an external high-speed diode as well. The body diodes tend to be slow and will not offer as much protection as a high power, high-speed Schottky diode would, for example. C7 is the primary resonant tank capacitor. This capacitor and the primary coil will create a second-order LC circuit that will give us a resonant frequency determined by the formula we looked at earlier:

where f is the resonant frequency in Hertz, L is the inductance of the primary in Henrys, and C is the capacitance of the MMC (“multiple miniature capacitors”, which is a short way of saying “capacitor bank”) in Farads. The trick is to match this frequency with the resonant frequency of your secondary coil and topload. Once you do that, you have a “tuned” Tesla coil.

6. The Tesla Coil
The Tesla coil itself consists of the primary coil, the secondary coil, and the topload. This part is fairly straightforward. Something that should be noted, however, is that there are two current transformers (or “CTs”) that are placed on the primary wire. In the schematic it shows two transformers labeled 1:1024, but really they are each a two-stage 1:32:32 toroidal transformers that the primary wire passes through. One toroid is for the feedback and one is for over-current detection. The enlarged image of the Tesla coil schematic is shown in Figure 13.

7. Feedback
The feedback circuitry begins with one of the CTs that the primary wire passes through. When current passes through the primary coil it induces a current in the secondary of the CT. We clean up this signal using some diode clipping and a Schmitt-Trigger inverter to ensure we get a nice square wave. This signal is passed back into the soft-switching circuitry for timing the interrupter signal, and also fed back into the IGBT drivers. This creates a feedback loop which ensures that the H-bridge switches when there is no current flowing through the IGBTs. The enlarged feedback circuit is shown in Figure 14.

One important thing to note in the feedback circuitry is the variable inductor in series with a 5 ohm resistor across the output of the transformer. This was originally intended to create what is called “phase lead” which, in simple terms, allows the IGBTs to handle higher frequencies. Recall that we use the flip-flop circuitry to soft-switch the IGBTs. However, large brick-type IGBTs (like CM300s) generally take a few hundred nanoseconds to switch. While this may not sound like much, the rise and fall times add up and cause the IGBTs to switch too late, which leads to them switching with some current flowing through them. Again, this leads to excessive heating, especially at higher frequencies. The phase lead allows us to “predict” when the current will cross zero, and make sure the IGBTs complete their turn-off process right as the current reaches zero. This probably isn’t as critical for the IGBTs I will be using as I am using smaller ones designed for high frequencies, but this will be useful in case I ever want to switch to CM300s or CM600s. By using a variable inductor it would be possible to adjust the phase lead until the actual switch-off happens right at the zero-current-crossing point.

However, after some initial testing it was determined that this phase lead system did not operate as expected due to some modifications I made to the design, and was eventually removed from the circuit.

8. Over-Current Detection (or "OCD")
Over-current detection is used to make sure you don’t stress your MMC and IGBTs past their operating limits. One of the best ways to do this is to use a current transformer on the primary coil, and a comparator to shut the coil off briefly if the sensed current exceeds the specified level. This gives the IGBTs time to cool down and the MMC time to recover, as well as allow the current to ring back down again. I based mine on one of Steve Ward’s designs which uses an LM311 comparator that feeds a signal into a one-shot 555 timer. The timer disables the driver for a millisecond or so to allow it to cool down briefly before restarting again. The OCD circuit diagram is shown in Figure 15.

If you’re familiar with comparators and 555 timers, it will be fairly easy for you to follow how this works. When the current exceeds the threshold, the voltage on the inverting pin of the comparator becomes higher than the set voltage on the non-inverting input. This causes the output of the comparator to be pulled to ground, creating a falling-edge signal on the trigger of the 555 timer. This causes the output of the 555 to go high for a certain amount of time determined by the values of C6 and R11. In my case, I use a 10k resistor and a 0.1uF capacitor. Based on the formula for a one-shot 555 timer:

these values give me an on-time of 1.1mS. While the 555 output is high, it pulls the input of the inverter (IC1C) low by an N-Channel MOSFET, and the “CLR” input of the flip-flop is held high. Since we’re tapping off of the /Q output, then the enable pins of the drivers which are connected to /Q are held low for that 1.1mS, which means the coil stays off for that amount of time. I realize there are several inversions here and it may be difficult to follow, but it comes out correctly in the end.

Interrupter Design

The interrupter is the part of the circuit that turns the Tesla coil on and off at a certain frequency by disabling the driver circuit multiple times per second. The interrupter is probably one of the easiest parts to design and build, but is still a critical piece if you designed your coil to run in non-continuous-wave (“CW”) mode. “Continuous Wave” means that your Tesla coil is constantly on, which means the output is running at the Tesla coil’s resonant frequency. These coils tend to be very quiet due to the fact that their operating frequency is well above the range that the human ear can detect, and since it is not being switched off for part of the cycle, the current it draws is significantly higher. This can be great for effect, but it puts a lot of strain on your coil, capacitors, H-bridge, and driver circuitry. Since the IGBTs I will be using really aren’t designed for very high power I wouldn’t dare run my coil in CW mode as they would surely be destroyed. The interrupter provides low duty cycle pulses to the H-bridge which significantly reduces the average current flowing through the transistors.

The Microchip MCP14E5 MOSFET driver chips have an “enable” pin that allows you to turn their outputs on or off. This is perfect for my DRSSTC since I will be able to have my interrupter control it directly. If you build a DRSSTC and do not use driver chips that have enable pins, you can use some AND and NAND gates (for the inverting and non-inverting drivers) instead, and have one input of each gate connected to your interrupter to give you the enable/disable control. Just make sure that when the interrupter is off, NEITHER driver is active. Otherwise you will be drawing current when you shouldn’t be, and it can lead to undesired operation or damage

One of the simplest interrupter designs I have seen to date is a basic 555 timer in astable mode. When designing an interrupter there are several things you will need to take into consideration. The main thing you’ll need to know is the maximum on-time that your IGBTs and capacitors can handle before the average current through them is too high. For this you will need to look at the datasheets, primarily the graphs. Figure out how your IGBTs, especially, are affected by temperature, current, and duty cycle. In a previous section I linked to a program written by Matt Giordano (“Sigurthr” on the 4hv.org forums) that can tell you what your maximum on-time should be based on the various aspects of your coil. This program is very useful when designing your interrupter.

The design shown in Figure 16 is one Steve Ward used in his DRSSTC1, which I looked at repeatedly (along with the designs for his Universal Driver 2) for reference throughout the design process. It simply uses a 555 timer and has two adjustments – one for on-time and one for off-time – which allows the operator to set the pulse width and frequency.

This interrupter design will get you started, though you may eventually decide to design your own, possibly with a microcontroller, to give you more control of the coil and added features (for example, audio-modulated “musical” Tesla coils).

Driver Design (GDTs and Driver Circuitry)

In this section we will explore the circuitry used to switch the transistors in the H-bridge. As mentioned in the Schematic section, I am using two parallel MCP14E5 Dual MOSFET drivers, each has one inverting driver and one non-inverting driver. When one output is high the other is low, allowing current to flow in one direction, and when the one output is low the other is high, allowing current to flow in the opposite direction. This is what generates the 15V bipolar square wave needed for driving the GDTs and the transistors in the H-bridge.

MOSFET drivers are required for this application instead of simply using logic circuitry not only because of the voltage, but also the current required to drive the GDTs and switch the IGBTs. If you look at the internal structure of a field-effect transistor (FET), you’ll see that there is a thin insulating film (usually made of silicon-oxide) between the gate contact and the doped substrate. You may recognize that this creates a capacitor – two conductive materials separated by an insulator. As I mentioned before, an IGBT is effectively a MOSFET switching a BJT, so the device will have a gate capacitance just like any other MOSFET. When running at the high frequencies of the DRSSTC resonant circuit, charging the gate capacitance (in order to turn on the IGBT) within a single cycle would require a large amount of current. Looking at the datasheet for my IGBTs (Fairchild part number FGH60N60UFD), I see that the Gate-Emitter charge is listed as being 21nC (shown in Figure 17):

Based on the formula:

where I is the current in Amps, Q is the charge (in Coulombs), and t is the time in seconds, in order to charge the gate capacitance in, say, 50nS, we would need:

The driver circuit would need to be able to supply 420mA to switch on the transistor within 50nS. Most logic devices can only source a small fraction of that! Furthermore, some transistors have even higher gate-emitter charges, or perhaps you need the transistors to switch on even faster, meaning it could even take several amps to switch on the devices. This is why we use special MOSFET drivers designed to be able to source this large amount of current.

In order to switch the transistors, it is important to remember that the gate-emitter voltage on the IGBTs is what determines whether or not they are turned on. Since the collectors of the top two transistors are connected to 170VDC and the collectors of the lower IGBTs are connected to the emitters of the upper ones, the timing just wouldn’t work if we only had one wire driving the gate of each IGBT and the other grounded. In order to switch on the top-left transistor, for example, it would need to have a gate voltage referenced to the source voltage (in our case, we would want it to be referenced to GND). However, in order to have the top-left transistor’s gate referenced to ground, the bottom-right transistor would already need to be switched on, connecting the primary circuit to ground through it. This means that instead of switching the opposite transistors at the same time (top-left/bottom-right, then top-right/bottom-left), the bottom transistors would need to turn on first before their corresponding top transistors could. This would switch the transistors at different times (bottom-right, then top-left, then bottom-left, then top-right). This would lead to all sorts of problems.

Therefore, we use a transformer that we refer to as a gate drive transformer, or “GDT”. Each secondary of the GDT connects directly across the gate and the emitter of its corresponding transistor, applying the voltage pulse directly across the gate and emitter, avoiding the need for the low-side transistors to be switched on first. By generating a pulse on the primary of the GDT, we can get the same (or very similar) pulse on each of the multiple secondaries which we can use to switch the transistors in the proper order.

Since the bridge has four IGBTs, I’ll need four secondaries on my GDT – one to drive each gate – and one primary winding for the signal. In full-bridge designs, the preferred method is to build a pentifilar (5-winding) transformer on a toroidal core. However, before you pick up just any toroid and start winding, we need to explore why not all toroids will work.

Many toroidal cores are designed for use as chokes and are absolutely lousy at higher frequencies, as in GDT applications. Instead of acting as a transformer (the primary inducing current in the secondaries), these cores prevent fast switching and thus a mangled waveform is generated on the secondaries. Iron cores or iron powder cores are probably the worst types to use for GDTs as they have a very low permeability and are very lossy. In order for the GDT to operate correctly it must have a very high permeability, generally >4,000 and preferably >10,000. Ferrite is a material generally used that has a very high permeability value. These are ideal for high frequency applications.

When designing a GDT the first thing you’ll want to determine is how many turns you’ll need. Too few and your core will saturate, giving poor performance. Too many and you’ll have a high leakage inductance which will also give you poor performance. Let’s start with the following formula:

B is the flux density in Teslas, V is the voltage at which you’ll be driving your GDT in volts, t is the on-time of the signal in seconds, N is the number of turns, and is the cross-sectional area of the core in square meters. Saturation occurs when the flux density reaches around 0.2 Teslas, so we’ll rearrange the formula to solve for ‘N’, since we’re looking for the minimum number of turns that we need:

Let’s plug in our values and see what we get. My controller drives the GDTs with a 15 volt signal, so that is our V. To get t we must first find the period of our signal. If you’ll recall, back when we were designing the resonant circuits we determined that my operating frequency will be about 127.04 kHz. Since period is 1/frequency, that gives us a period of 7.87 uS. However, we’re not quite done with this yet. Since t is the on-time, we then have to multiply that value by the duty cycle as well. In this case I’m going to assume 10% (probably the highest duty cycle I’ll ever run at), so 7.87 us * 0.1 = 0.787 us. B, we decided earlier, would need to be set to 0.2T to signify the point of saturation. Finally, we can generally get from the datasheet of the core. The for the toroid cores I ordered from Digikey (part number 495-3868-ND, which are ferrite toroid cores from EPCOS, part number B64290L0674X038) is stated to be 95.89 mm^2, or 9.89 * 10^(-5) m^2. Plugging that all into the formula we get:

Well, obviously we’re going to want more than 0.6 turns on our GDT, so we shouldn’t have to worry about saturation. Most DRSSTC coilers wind their GDTs with 8-15 turns, though it often involves a bit of trial-and-error, as well as some waveform testing using a signal generator and an oscilloscope. I re-wound my GDTs several times before I got an acceptable waveform. Something else to watch out for is having mismatched inductances between the secondaries. If your secondaries aren’t the exact same length, you may get some switching delay that could cause your coil to perform poorly, and even damage the IGBTs. We will look at our options in the build portion of this document.

Keep in mind that it is important to keep the windings on the GDT as tight as possible to the core. Loose winding leads to higher leakage inductance, which will likely cause excessive ringing with the IGBT gate capacitances, and less efficient signal transference from the primary to the secondaries. These oscillations have been known to exceed the turn-on voltage of the transistors, causing them to switch on when they’re supposed to be off. This can lead to damage. An extremely useful reference for building and testing your GDTs is Richie Burnett’s gate-drive transformer page, which can be found here:

Richie Burnett: Typical gate drive waveforms

That page shows various examples of different waveforms (good and bad), explains the causes for the bad ones, and offers suggestions for how to improve them.

H-Bridge

The H-bridge, or just “Bridge”, is the part of the circuit that drives the series tank circuit that is made up of the primary coil and the tank capacitor. The purpose of the bridge is to generate a high voltage (170VDC) bipolar square wave from the low voltage (15VDC) bipolar square wave from the GDTs by changing the direction of the current through the primary coil and tank capacitor repeatedly. This is mainly done via two or four transistors switched in such a way as to continuously reverse the current in the primary tank circuit. The most common type of transistor to use is the IGBT. While MOSFETs may work, their losses will be much higher due to their on-resistance. As current increases, the power increases exponentially as seen in Ohm’s Law:

where P is the power dissipated by the resistance, I is the current flowing through the resistance, and R is the on-resistance of the MOSFET. On the other hand, IGBTs (Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors) are effectively BJTs switched on by a MOSFET, meaning that the collector-emitter connection acts as a diode, and thus have a constant voltage drop. Therefore the power dissipation only increases linearly with current:

where P is the power dissipated by the diode, I is the current, and V is the voltage drop of the C-E junction. At the currents we’ll be seeing in this Tesla coil application, IGBTs are much more efficient than MOSFETs, will not heat up as much, and will not be damaged as easily. I plan to use IGBTs for this project, so when I reference the bridge transistors, those are what I am referring to.

There are two main methods to drive the primary tank circuit:

• A half bridge

• A full bridge

The half bridge utilizes two transistors switched alternately and two bus capacitors to create a voltage across the primary and tank cap that repeatedly switches polarity. The schematic is shown in Figure 18.

While the part count is low and the half bridge design is generally cheaper to build, it probably isn’t suitable for high-current coils unless you purchase IGBTs designed for very high currents. Furthermore, due to the capacitor divider between the positive and negative rails, the primary circuit only sees half the voltage that a full bridge would (in my case, applying rectified 120VAC mains, it would only switch between +85V and -85V, rather than +170V and -170V). It is also very important that you include bleeder resistors across the bus capacitors, as they can store a lethal charge.

Please note that the above circuit is purely representative. You will need decoupling capacitors and return paths for the transistors, as they are switched based on the Gate-Emitter voltage, and you will need lots of protection circuitry. Simply using the above schematic to build your half bridge will NOT work, and could cause damage. If you would prefer to pursue a half-bridge design then there are various sources available online, but I will not be covering half-bridge designs here.

The full bridge, often referred to as an H-bridge due to its shape, is commonly used in DC motor driver applications to change the shaft direction by switching the motor polarity. In this case we’ll be using it to change the direction of the current through the primary coil and tank capacitor. The full bridge uses four transistors instead of only two, and eliminates the need for bus capacitors (besides the big one across the output from the mains rectifier). This is the design I plan to use for my DRSSTC. In Figure 19 you will see how switching specific transistors at just the right times generates an alternating current on the output. The red arrows symbolize the conventional current flow (in reality it flows from negative to positive, but that’s a different topic). The zig-zags shown next to the gates of the IGBTs represent rising and falling edges of the drive signals. A red zig-zag represents a rising edge, and a black zig-zag represents a falling edge.

As you can see, transistors at the opposite corners of the bridge are switched together, and this reverses the current through the center portion, which in our case contains our primary resonant circuit. This, in turn, causes the primary circuit to become excited and oscillate at its resonant frequency.

As I mentioned before, I plan to drive my bridge with 170VDC. My IGBTs need to be able to handle voltages MUCH higher than that, at high current. Their switching times should also be as low as possible, preferably turn-on times of only a few tens of nanoseconds, and turn-off times of no more than, say, 120nS. In general, you want to minimize these values as much as possible. The datasheet for the IGBTs will also have graphs showing the switching time versus the drive voltage. A higher drive voltage generally leads to faster switching times, so that is something else to keep in mind.

Feedback Circuitry

Most of this has been covered in the Schematic section, but there are a few points that I would like to add to the theory of the feedback circuitry. The point of this circuit is to convert the sine wave from the feedback current transformer to a clean square wave that can be used as a clock to the flip-flop (to ensure it switches at the zero-current crossing) and as an input to the MOSFET driver chips. Again, the overall current transformer has a 1:1024 ratio, meaning that the current will be 1024x lower than the primary current and the voltage will be 1000x greater. You may be thinking, wouldn’t that voltage be much too high for the driver circuitry? The answer is yes, which is why the Zener diodes have been placed in the circuit. This secondary feedback configuration was taken directly from Steve Ward’s DRSSTC1 design. The Zener diodes are 4.7V, meaning that if the voltage exceeds 4.7V when reverse biased, they will conduct and only allow 4.7V into the rest of the driver circuitry. We have one of these diodes on each “leg” of the CT secondary, since we will be getting an alternating current out. This clamps the voltage to 0V and 4.7V, which is acceptable for the logic circuitry. However, these Zener diodes are very slow, which means that when the current on the CT switches direction, the diodes might become forward-biased which would generate a low-voltage square wave (around 0.6V max). This would cause timing issues with the driver. Therefore, we also include an ultra-fast diode front-to-front with each Zener diode to prevent them from ever being forward-biased. These diodes add another 0.6V drop, which means the logic circuitry will see between 0V and 5.3V (instead of just 4.7V due to the Zener diodes alone). This clamping forces the high-amplitude sine wave from the CT to look more like a square wave, which is what we need. This signal is then passed through a 100nF capacitor to ensure only AC signals can pass through (again, to prevent latch-up), and then through a 560 ohm resistor to limit the current into the two Schmitt trigger inverters. To prevent any voltage spikes from entering the logic circuitry, we add two more ultra-fast diodes to clamp the signal to the + or – rail if it fluctuates beyond the limits. The Schmitt triggers simply convert our near-square-wave (actually a clipped sine wave) to a real square wave and cleans it up even further. The output of the second Schmitt Trigger then feeds into our soft-switching circuitry and into our gate driver chips.

The Build

Now that we’ve covered the basic theory behind how a Tesla coil works, the components that make up a DRSSTC, and the calculations required for designing the parts, it’s time to get started with the actual build. Generally you’ll want to do a vast majority of the planning and design before you begin the building process, though many of the designs may change if you have difficulty sourcing parts, or trial-and-error suggests you need to make a change.

Building the Secondary

I generally start my Tesla coil builds with the secondary coil. Thankfully most of the design for my secondary was already done, so all I had to do was put it together. I started with a 4.5” outer-diameter PVC pipe (white PVC. Don’t use black PVC for Tesla coils, as it contains traces of carbon which is conductive at higher voltages. This conductivity will likely cause problems during operation). I bought a few thousand feet of #34 AWG magnet wire and started winding (by hand). Ten and a quarter hours and over 1800 feet of wire later, I finished winding my secondary. Most people build jigs to help them wind their secondaries more quickly, but having limited resources I did it all by hand. The coil is 12 inches tall with approximately 1500 turns, which gave me an inductance of around 87-88mH. Figures 20, 21, and 22 show the PVC pipe, wire, and completed secondary coil.

The next step was to coat it in polyurethane. There are several reasons why we do this:

• It protects the fine secondary wire from being damaged by bumps and dings

• It helps prevent arcing from the middle of the secondary (instead of from the topload) and from arcs racing across the surface

• It gives us a nice, smooth, glossy surface that just looks gorgeous when done right

Doing it right, however, is the tricky part. In order to get a smooth surface from the polyurethane, you really must have the coil in a jig that spins it at a fairly low speed. Setting the secondary horizontally and applying the polyurethane works, but you are almost sure to get air bubbles and drips if it is left stationary. This results in a very bumpy, ugly-looking secondary coil. It is often recommended that you apply up to 16 coats of polyurethane with a foam brush or credit card to a spinning secondary and leave it spinning for a few hours (or overnight, depending on if your polyurethane is fast-drying or not) between coats. If there are air bubbles when a coat is dry, you can gently sand them down using 400-grit (or finer) sandpaper. Just make sure you don’t sand into your wire!

A wood lathe is probably the best option for turning your secondary as you apply the polyurethane and let it dry, since they tend to have reasonably low speeds. Unfortunately I didn’t have one, so I was forced to be a bit more creative. I had an old 120VAC vacuum cleaner motor that I clamped into my bench vise. The motor shaft was threaded, so I drilled and tapped the head of a bolt so that it would screw onto the shaft. This gave me a slightly better surface to attach the secondary. I then wrapped a few layers of duct tape around the bolt until it would fit snugly into a long, straight piece of ½” copper pipe. I then cut holes in two plastic container lids (they were a perfect size to fit over the end of the PVC) just big enough to pass the copper tube through. Now I had a motor (the vacuum cleaner motor) and an axle (the copper pipe) that would hold the secondary coil and spin it. This presented another issue, however: Vacuum cleaner motors generally spin at a very high speed. For this reason I connected mine to my Variac so that I could adjust the voltage being applied to it. Please note this is not a very good way to do this, and I would strongly recommend setting up a pulley or gear system with a motor that is easier to control.

I found that running my motor at around 50VAC would spin the secondary at a good speed, but due to the unexpected load on the motor it would get very warm after only a couple of minutes. This meant I would not be able to keep it spinning as it dried. For this reason, my secondary ended up with some air bubbles and drips. However, if I can set up a new jig for turning the coil I will probably sand it lightly and apply a fresh coat while the secondary is spinning, which should clean it up nicely.

Building the Topload

My topload is a very simple and cheap one. I took some 4 inch aluminum dryer duct and bent it into a donut shape. I then used some aluminum foil tape (available at most hardware stores) to tape the ends together, and then I taped around the entire outside of the duct. This gave me a nice, reasonably-smooth surface free of holes or sharp ridges that were in the dryer duct. The final step was to fill the hole in the center of the “donut”. For this I used a 9 inch aluminum pie plate and taped it in (both from the top and bottom) with the same foil tape I used to tape over the surface of the toroid. Just like that, my topload was completed.

Ideally one would use a spun aluminum toroid for this purpose. Spun aluminum toroids are incredibly smooth and prevent premature breakout, and they also look very snazzy. Unfortunately they are also very expensive, and not in my budget for this coil. Maybe someday.

Building the Capacitor Bank

The capacitor bank we designed was made up of 16 2uF 530VAC Aerovox RBPS PP film IGBT snubber capacitors in series, giving us a total tank capacitance of 125nF and voltage rating of 8480VAC. The capacitors used in my setup are shown in Figure 23.

Due to the way the tabs are oriented, I was able to connect multiple capacitors together back-to-back with little trouble. I used steel screws and nuts to make the connection. You may recall that I said not to use steel in a Tesla coil because it is very lossy at high frequencies. This is true, but these bolts and nuts are not being used to make an electrical connection. They are being used to clamp the capacitor tabs together, so the majority of the current will be flowing through the capacitor tabs, rather than the steel bolts. The assembly of one bank is shown in Figure 24.

Notice that at the far end of the capacitor bank I use a strip of aluminum to tie the tabs together. Once again, the steel bolts and nuts are only used for mechanical support, and should not see much current.

Building the Primary Coil

The primary coil is all that we need now to complete the primary resonant circuit. According to the outputs from JavaTC that we got during the design process, the secondary coil inductance and topload capacitance is expected to oscillate at a frequency of 127.04 kHz. Our ultimate goal is to match that frequency precisely with the primary tank circuit (though the arc will add capacitance as well, so that will affect tuning). A dual-resonant Tesla coil has two resonant circuits: The secondary coil and topload, and the primary coil and MMC. Right now, all we’re missing is the primary inductor.

JavaTC told us that our primary inductance required to resonate with the MMC at 127.04 kHz is around 12.58uH. This is what we need to do now.

My primary coil material of choice for this small coil is ¼” copper tubing. JavaTC stated that I would need 14.46 feet of it. However, I bought 20 feet (which cost me around $18 at my local family-owned hardware store) in order to provide plenty of turns for tuning. It is always good practice to have plenty of turns like this, just in case you decide to make any changes later on that will require a higher primary coil inductance.

Let’s begin with the stand. For this project I decided to re-use the stand that I built for a spark-gap Tesla coil many years ago. It doesn’t look pretty – I threw it together in about half an hour – but it had a good shape for this coil, as well as a shelf where I can put all of the driver electronics. Figure 25 shows what it looks like by itself:

The first step was to set up some spacers to hold the primary coil in place. I decided to use a ¼ inch wooden dowel cut into ~1 inch lengths. I drilled the holes on the base exactly ½ inch center-to-center. This would ensure that the ¼ inch tubing would fit snugly between each dowel (1/8 inch on either side of the dowel center leaves ¼ inch between the inserted pegs). This construction is shown in Figures 26 and 27.

After the holes were drilled I placed as many pins in as I could. I realized later that I should have bought another long dowel to fill all of the holes, but this one was just long enough for my coil.

Now that the supports are in it’s time to lay down the primary coil. When building a flat Tesla coil primary like this, buying the pre-coiled tubing is almost a necessity (shown in Figures 28 and 29). It makes placing the primary incredibly easy, and I would never dream of doing it any other way. If not done properly, trying to bend the tubing yourself would likely cause it to become kinked and practically unusable for the Tesla coil.

If you look closely at the last photo, you’ll see that I drilled two more holes straight through the base, and bent the primary copper to fit through these holes. This is the best way I have found to do it for a couple of reasons:

• It leaves the ends of the tubing pointing downwards to the “shelf”, which allows for much easier connection to the bridge and MMC without much extra inductance

• It leaves no sharp edges on the top. Sharp primary edges can sometimes lead to flashover from the secondary, which could cause severe, irreparable damage to the secondary coil. I have seen this happen, and it is not pretty.

That’s it! The primary coil is done, simple as that. When designing your coil in JavaTC, it’s important to keep an eye on how far away the first turn of the primary coil is from the secondary. I allowed about half an inch on mine, which in theory should be ok provided the secondary is properly grounded to RF ground.

Building the Strike Rail

Now that we have the primary coil in place it’s time to add a bit of protection. The last thing we want to happen is for a streamer from the topload to reach down and strike the primary coil, sending a very high voltage and high frequency surge back into our transistors and other sensitive driver electronics. Most Tesla coils use what’s called a “strike ring” or “strike rail” that “catches” these strikes and routes them to RF ground, thus protecting the primary coil and driver. RF ground should be a long, metal stake pounded into the ground. This goes for any Tesla coil, not just DRSSTCs.

I decided to use ½ inch copper tubing for my strike rail, but this time I only bought 10 feet of it. I only need enough to go around the outside of my primary coil one time, so 10 feet was certainly overkill. It was, however, one of the better deals I found. I also purchased a cutting tool designed to neatly cut copper tubing without crimping it. I highly recommend buying a tool like this if you’re going to be cutting copper. Figure 30 shows the label for my strike rail tubing.

Once again, I bought the pre-coiled tubing which makes placing it much simpler.

Before I could place the strike rail on the stand, however, I needed some sort of support for it. Generally a strike rail should sit a couple of inches above the primary to ensure it would be the preferred target for any errant streamers. I bought 4 ¾ inch PVC couplers, drilled a hole through one side, used a Dremel with a cutting wheel attachment to open up the hole, and finally a grinder attachment to widen it. This probably sounds a bit confusing, so Figure 31 is a picture of the supports with the strike rail inserted:

Notice that there is a gap between the two ends of the strike rail. This is very important. If the two ends wee touching it would act like a shorted 1-turn secondary coil. This could cause significant heating, and also would affect the magnetic field surrounding the primary and secondary coil. In general the gap between the ends should be around 1 inch. I miscalculated the length a bit, so mine has a 2 inch gap instead. This shouldn’t cause any problems though.

Finally, I decided to wrap the ends in electrical tape to cover up any sharp edges and to make it look a little neater. An even better option would have been to use the rubber caps made to slip over the ends of copper tubing to protect the handler from any sharp edges left over after cutting. Unfortunately I did not have any readily-available, so the tape had to suffice. This is shown in Figure 32.

And with that, both of our resonant circuits are complete! The only things missing are the connections and the driver circuitry, which we’ll cover in the next section. Figure 33 shows what the final topload, secondary coil, primary coil, and strike rail all look like fully assembled.

Building the Gate Drive Transformers

One of the easiest and most effective methods for winding a gate drive transformer is wrapping CAT5 Ethernet cable (still in its sheath) around the toroid core. The conductors inside are individually insulated and already twisted in pairs, reducing leakage inductance significantly. This also allows tight, even winding of the primaries and secondaries. The ends of all the white wires on each “leg” can be soldered together to form the primary coil, and each colored conductor pair is its own secondary. This gives you one primary coil and 4 secondary coils, which is exactly what we need for driving an H-bridge. Since I had two bridges to drive, I built two identical GDTs, shown in Figure 34.

Building the Bridge

In order to generate the alternating current required for the primary coil and MMC to oscillate, you’ll recall we’ll need to create a “Bridge”. Once again, I will be using an H-bridge configuration for my Tesla coil. This is done using four transistors that, when switched in a certain way, alternate the direction of current flow through the connected device. It is the same circuit used in many motor drivers to change the motor direction. In our case it alternates the direction of current flowing through the primary tank circuit.

The H-bridge was one of the first parts I thought about when starting the design for this Tesla coil. It is one of the most important parts in the design. While all parts of the Tesla coil are necessary for its operation, improper construction of the bridge could cause issues ranging from poor output to severe damage of the device and surrounding property. My original plan was to use large CM300 IGBT bricks, but I eventually settled on 60N60 IGBTs in TO-247 packages. While these will get significantly hotter than the CM300s due to their small thermal dissipation area, they will be able to run much faster, which is very important in small, higher-frequency Tesla coil applications.

I was a bit concerned that the transistors I chose wouldn’t be able to handle the extremely high currents involved in Tesla coils. The packages were very small and will have trouble dissipating the heat. I eventually decided that I would double-up the bridges. Using two bridges in parallel instead of only one will allow them to share the current, thus allowing them as a whole to handle about twice the current that only one of them could (in theory, assuming even loading). Figures 35-38 are a few screenshots showing my bridge PCB design.

Above we have:

• Figure 35 (Top-left): Bottom layer of the PCB design

• Figure 36 (Top-right): Top layer of the PCB design

• Figure 37 (Bottom-left): A 3-D rendering (done in Eagle3D) of the bottom of the board (The IGBT models are backwards though, the backs of the IGBTs should be facing down so that the thermal tabs mate with the heat sink)

• Figure 38 (Bottom-right): A 3-D rendering (done in Eagle3D) of the top of the board

In these designs I have kept the connections as short as possible and the polygon fills as wide as possible, to minimize inductance and to allow for better current handling. The schematic I used to create these boards is shown in Figure 39.

Please excuse the sloppiness of the circuit (labels, etc). This schematic was never intended to be released publicly. I only drew it so that I could design the PCB. Also, the P6KE27CA diodes are shown as standard diodes, but they are actually bidirectional TVS diodes. Also, as mentioned before, I recommend using external high-power, high-speed Schottky diodes for added protection.

I chose to make PCBs so that I could have wide traces on the high-current paths, as well as have complete control over the trace impedance/inductance. I wouldn’t trust hand-wired boards for several reasons:

• Lower current-handling capabilities

• More difficult to mount high-power transistors

• More lead inductance, which could cause timing delays, potentially causing the transistors to switch too late and cause damage

• Uglier/less professional. This isn’t important for Tesla coils per se, but I prefer my boards to be neat.

Once the designs were complete, I sent them to my favorite PCB manufacturer, who made 10 of them for me. The final version turned out quite well, and I am fairly pleased with it. Figures 40-43 show the final assembled version of my H-bridge boards.

In order to mount the boards to the heat sink I need two main things: Extremely thin electrical insulation (we don’t want the rear tabs of the IGBTs, which are connected to the collectors, to short to the heat sink!) and thermal compound. I purchased a 1 mil thick sheet of Kapton online to use for the electrical insulation. For the thermal compound I bought some cheap PC CPU thermal paste. The combination of the two will prevent the back pads of the IGBTs from shorting to the heat sink, but will still allow for good thermal contact, ensuring that as much heat as possible is transferred to the heat sink. Be sure to add thermal paste between the IGBTs and Kapton, and also between the Kapton and the heat sink. The compound is designed to fill any small fissures or craters in the metal, providing more surface area for dissipating the heat. Keeping the bridge cool can be very difficult in DRSSTC applications, but is very important.

When using very fine Kapton like what I am using, it is critical that your heat sink is very smooth and free of any burrs (around screw holes, for example) that could poke through and make contact with the IGBT cases. I had this happen and I didn’t realize it, and tracking down the problem took me quite a while. If you drill holes in your heat sink to mount your IGBTs, be careful of burrs sticking out of the hole, or that might be pulled up through the hole as the bolt is screwed in. To help minimize the possibility of sharp edges, after drilling the holes for the IGBTs I took a much larger drill bit and drilled a very slight countersink. This puts the opening for the screw slightly below the surface of the heat sink, which 1) helps clean off existing burrs, and 2) helps prevent any small burrs pulled up by the screw from poking through the Kapton.

The next step would be to bus the supply rails of the bridges together using large bus bars (I am using ¾ inch wide, 1/8 inch thick aluminum stock) and place a large filter capacitor across the positive and negative 170VDC rail. For my coil I bought a 3300uF 350VDC RIFA capacitor online that should do the trick. This capacitor will need to be mounted as close to the boards as possible, to make sure that the DC on the bridge is as smooth as possible and to minimize losses. The rectifier I am using to rectify the mains voltage is a large 3-phase rectifier module, though I’m only using two of the connections. This will give me full-wave rectification on the output. The setup is shown in Figures 44-46.

At this point I should point out that I am only using brass bolts and nuts for the connections to the PCB, since they will be acting as electrical connections. Again, steel will not work well at this power level and these frequencies. Brass, aluminum, or copper are ideal materials for bus construction and connections between parts of your Tesla coil.

Another important thing to note is that I currently have my H-bridge PCBs bused together using #6 AWG cable, and the external connections are made to one of the ends of the wire. Unfortunately this puts the load closer to one of the boards than the other and can cause uneven loading of the H-bridge boards. They will not be able to share the load evenly which means one will be stressed more than the other. In the future I would probably try to equalize the lengths of the connections between the boards to ensure they are loaded evenly. Bus bars would be far better than #6 cable, and I would be able to connect to the center of the bus bar, rather than at just one end.

At the end of my heat sink I will have a powerful fan blowing cool air through the fins. Good air flow through the heat sink is very important to keep it as cool as possible.

Building the Driver

My original driver was handmade on a piece of Veroboard, but I really didn’t like it. The wiring was very inefficient and overall just looked sloppy. The wire lengths were also not matched very well which could lead to timing problems. Ultimately I decided to design a new driver PCB, which I then sent to my favorite manufacturer who made me 10 boards. The completed PCB is shown in Figure 47.

Assembled it’s still not the prettiest board I’ve done, but at least it looks better than the hand-wired mess that I built originally.

Building the Current Sense Transformers

The current transformers, or “CTs”, are used to capture the waveform of the current in the primary tank circuit and to use it to monitor its amplitude for over-current detection, and to send a feedback signal to the driver circuitry. The construction of these current transformers is very simple. I use the same cores as I used for the GDTs and, once again, used Ethernet cable. This time, however, I took it out of its sheath and used Tom Blitch’s method for winding a 1:1024 current transformer. His video can be found here:

Winding DRSSTC PRIMARY Feedback Current Transformers

Each transformer has two cores making up two “stages”, to minimize the number of required windings. The resulting CTs were then glued together so that they can be placed together around one of the cables connecting the primary tank circuit to the bridge. The completed feedback and OCD current transformers are shown in Figures 49 and 50.

Building the Protection Circuitry

One of the worst things that can happen while running a DRSSTC is for the streamer to strike the primary coil and destroy your transistors. As mentioned before, the strike ring is designed to “catch” such strikes before they hit the primary, but electricity can be very unpredictable. For one reason or another it may decide that a jump to the primary coil is an easier path. Such strikes have been known to destroy IGBTs and other driver circuitry, which we obviously don’t want. We need to do something to protect the circuitry from primary strikes.

In Steve Ward’s write-up of his DRSSTC4, which can be found at http://www.stevehv.4hv.org/DRSSTC4.htm , he links to a very helpful diagram he drew that suggests a method to help prevent damage from primary strikes. This diagram is shown in Figure 51:

In this diagram you’ll notice that the RF ground connects to the driver shielding, the H-bridge heat sink, the strike rail, and the bottom of the secondary coil. It also connects to AC ground.

Also included in Steve’s diagram are two 0.1uF capacitors, one between the positive and negative DC rail, and one between the negative DC rail and the heat sink (RF ground). I already had several 0.15uF 940C30P15K-F capacitors from Cornell-Dubilier so I used two of those in the places shown in the diagram. This setup is shown in Figure 53.

The main purpose of the 0.15uF capacitor between the negative rail and RF ground (C3) is to allow the current from the primary strike while the IGBTs are conducting to safely pass through the IGBTs, through the low impedance of the cap, to RF ground. The capacitor between the positive and negative rails (C2) is there to pass the current of the strike whenever the reverse diodes of the IGBTs are conducting. The current from the strike will flow through the reverse diodes to the positive rail, which is coupled to the negative rail through C2, and thus coupled to RF ground via C3. In theory this path (regardless of whether it flows through the IGBTs or the reverse diodes) is a much lower impedance than the path through the insulation of the IGBTs, which hopefully means the IGBTs will be protected. If the capacitors weren’t there, the chance of the high voltage punching through the IGBT’s insulation to get to the heat sink (the nearest RF ground) would be quite high, which would probably destroy the transistors.

The next step was to ground my coil. I used a thin aluminum bar to make the RF ground connections. I first used a long strip connecting the strike rail to my heat sink. I then cut a smaller strip that connects to the base of the secondary coil through a spade connector, and the other end is bolted to the first strip. This shorter bar is also bent around the front to provide a point where I can connect the grounding rod or cable (shown in Figures 54 and 55).

This concludes the build of my Dual-Resonant Solid State Tesla Coil. The overall assembly is shown in Figures 56 and 57.

Granted, this probably won’t be the final setup as it’s still just thrown together with no thought of organization, but this is how it will be run for the first time I fire it up. Notice the long red #6 AWG wire coming out of the right side of the coil. It has the extra slack to allow the primary coil tap to be moved around the coil freely. However, it also adds excessive length and inductance which is not desirable. Unfortunately at this point in time there is not much I can do about that. Since the coil will be moving to different environments and the tuning will be different, I need to have the freedom to move the tap wherever it needs to go.

Testing

Before I fire this coil up for the first time I want to make sure that everything is working properly up to this point. There are four main categories for testing a DRSSTC:

• Low power testing

• High power testing

• First light

• Tuning

Low Power Testing

This first section involves testing the driver circuitry itself without applying power to the bus. The main thing we’ll want to test is that the gate drive waveforms are correct (and are correctly alternating to ensure the H-bridge will switch properly). To get the most accurate waveforms you’ll need to connect the driver and GDTs to the bridge, but you won’t want to apply the DC bus voltage to the bridge yet. Since the IGBT gates have a capacitance (which provides a load impedance), the waveforms will look different than if they were not connected and you were probing the output from the GDTs directly. For this reason the GDT secondaries must be connected to the bridges, and the scope probe should be connected between the gate and emitter of each transistor.

Figure 58 shows each of my IGBT Gate-Emitter waveforms. Recall that I have a dual full-bridge setup, so that is a total of 8 IGBTs I will be probing. I decided to probe two IGBTs at a time that have opposite polarity (when one is switched on, the other is off). This would have been much easier to do if I had a four-channel scope, but since all I had was my Rigol DS1052e two-channel oscilloscope I had to make do.

There are a few things to look for when measuring the gate drive waveforms, though the main thing to look for is ringing. As mentioned before in the design section, ringing on the IGBT gates is caused by the LC circuit consisting of the GDT and the IGBT gate capacitance. Sometimes the amplitude of this ringing can be so high that it can actually switch the IGBTs on and off when they’re not supposed to. This can lead to excessive heating and severe damage to the transistors. You may recall that we connected a 5 ohm resistor (5.1 ohms, to be precise) in series with each IGBT gate. This resistor is designed to damp these oscillations to prevent unwanted switching. If you look at the above waveforms you’ll notice that on each rising edge there is a slight curve between the vertical segment and the horizontal segment of the waveform. This curve is due to the RC time constant of the resistor and the IGBT gate capacitance. If the resistor wasn’t there, there would likely be a large spike on the rising edge and an oscillation starting at the spike that eventually settles down to the horizontal segment (or, depending on how bad the oscillation is, it may not settle down at all). What we’re aiming for is a clean square wave, and the above waveform shows that we’ve gotten pretty close to that.

Something else to note is that there is a slight amplitude difference between some of the waveforms. If these differences were more significant I would be concerned, as that might cause some delay in switching the IGBTs or cause them to not fully turn on when they should. This can lead to uneven switching/loading, which puts excess strain on the other IGBTs that can cause damage. Thankfully the difference is relatively minor and shouldn’t pose a threat in my case. However, if I were to re-wind my GDTs I would try to be more careful about matching the lead lengths.

High Power Testing

This is where things get interesting, and potentially hazardous. This is the point where we apply a voltage to the bus, but leave the secondary coil out of the setup. It is very important that you use observe all possible safety precautions and consider that, even though there is no secondary coil, there can still be thousands of volts and hundreds of amps flowing through certain parts of the circuit. The point where the primary tank capacitor connects to the primary coil can have a potential of several thousand volts with currents that can be extremely lethal. I recommend keeping a distance of at least 5 feet when conducting the tests, and preferably more. This will also reduce the chance of personal harm if a capacitor or transistor explodes, though 5 feet is definitely on the lower end. I suggest giving yourself as much space as you possibly can.

There are two waveforms you’re going to want to look for when conducting these tests: the primary current waveform and the bridge output waveform. In my case, the primary current waveform is measured by connecting a 10 ohm resistor across the output of one of the current transformers (ideally you would have a third, separate CT for testing the waveforms) with the scope + and – leads connected across it. This resistor acts as a shunt that, assuming a 1:1000 turns ratio on the CT, provides a nice 1V/100A output ratio. This figure is very convenient not only for testing purposes, but also for setting the over-current limiting circuitry (which also connects to a current transformer with a 10 ohm resistor across it). In reality the turns ratio is 1:1024, so to get the 1V/100A output ratio the resistor would need to be 10.24 ohms. I ended up using two 5.1 ohm resistors in series giving me 10.2 ohms, which should be close enough for all intents and purposes.

The Bridge output waveform is measured directly across the output from the bridge (across the primary coil and tank capacitor series circuit). Before you do this, however, it is very important that you ensure your oscilloscope is isolated from mains ground. Something some electronics hobbyists don’t know is that the ground lead of the oscilloscope probe is generally connected to mains ground through the power cord. If someone tried to connect the probe across the output of the bridge (each side has a potential of between 0 and 170VDC if powered from rectified 120VAC mains), the ground lead would connect 170VDC directly to ground, shorting the scope and potentially damaging it. For this reason an isolation transformer is an absolute must. Similarly, do not try to probe two different points on your Tesla coil using the same scope, even if you use different channels. Supposing the oscilloscope is isolated from mains ground through the isolation transformer, the ground leads of the two channels are still connected together inside the scope. If you use one probe to measure across the bridge, and the other to measure the primary waveform (assuming you’re measuring across the resistor on the driver board), you will effectively be connecting 170VDC (at full power) to the low-voltage driver circuitry, once again potentially causing serious damage (or even injury if you try adjusting the driver while the coil is running).

Furthermore, it is immensely helpful to power your Tesla coil using a Variac. This gives you complete control over the voltage at which you drive the coil, and helps prevent any “blowouts” from simply applying the full voltage instantaneously. Just note that a Variac is not an isolation transformer, so be mindful of that as well.

In line with recommending a Variac, there are also a couple of other comments that should be made. The first of which is some sort of inrush current limiting for your DC bus. Suppose your bus capacitor is fully discharged, and you decide to instantly supply 170VDC to the bus. We know that at the instant a voltage is applied across a discharged capacitor it acts like a short circuit. This means a large current spike would be generated, potentially blowing fuses, tripping breakers, or even damaging parts (your rectifier, for example). To prevent the circuit from looking like a dead short, we need something to limit the current. Generally this is done using a high power (probably 10+ watt) resistor with a value of between 25 ohms and 100 ohms between the + rectifier output and the + rail of the bus. However, this resistor shouldn’t stay in the circuit during normal operation (after the capacitor is charged up), otherwise it will just be sitting there wasting power and heating up. The resistor would need to be switched out of the circuit for normal Tesla coil operation, which can be done using relays or even a suitably rated toggle switch. I don’t really recommend the latter as it puts you close to the high bus voltage while switched on. It would be best to switch it out of the circuit remotely using a relay instead.

An alternative method which has been adopted by many Tesla coil builders is what’s referred to as a “pre-charge circuit”, which effectively charges the bus capacitor slowly until it gets to a point where it would be safe to apply the bus voltage. These pre-charge circuits would also be “switched out” of the Tesla coil circuit remotely using relays after charging the bus capacitor and prior to running the coil.

Other options for current limiting would be a capacitor in series with the mains “HOT” line (before the rectifier) which would limit the inrush current from the AC side, or a choke that would be connected in place of the resistor between the + output of the rectifier and the + bus rail. This would help impede the sudden current spike when the bus voltage is switched on. Both of these methods are more advanced, however, and calculations would need to be made to ensure that nothing would be damaged due to the high inrush current. Generally you can avoid needing any of the above if you simply use a Variac and apply the voltage to the bus slowly, rather than applying all 170VDC at once.

One final item I would like to add is that it would be a good idea to connect a bleeder resistor across the bus capacitor. These capacitors tend to be very large (in the range of several thousand microfarads) and can store a significant amount of charge. If you were to come in contact with the bus even if the coil had been turned off for a long time, the charge in the capacitor could still cause a serious shock. Putting a 20kohm-100kohm resistor rated for several watts across the bus will allow it to discharge naturally after the power is removed. However, depending on the size of the resistor, you may not want to leave it in the circuit at all times as you will be applying 170VDC (or possibly more) across it whenever the supply is turned on. For this reason some people use a relay to remotely switch the bleeder resistor into the circuit (when the coil is turned off) and out of the circuit (when the coil is going to be turned on).

Now that those comments are out of the way, we can proceed with our testing. The first thing I did was set up a “dummy load” in place of the secondary coil, directly within and above the primary coil. Without it, the primary circuit will pull a significant amount of current which may lead to unreasonable or unrealistic test results. This dummy load can be any ferromagnetic item with relatively large mass. Cast iron frying pans tend to be a favorite in the DRSSTC builders community. I didn’t have a cast iron frying pan, so I used a microwave oven transformer instead. I placed it on top of the support that my secondary coil fits over, which is approximately 6 inches above the primary. I set my current limiter to around 400 amps (4V on pin 2 of the LM311 comparator, IC2 in the schematic), though it would have been acceptable to set it to around 200 amps for a start, and I slowly turned my Variac up to 15VAC (which translates to about 21.2VDC on the bus). After I got to 15VAC I turned on my interrupter (which at this point is simply an Arduino supplying a ~440Hz signal with a ~5% duty cycle) and watched the waveform on the output of the current transformer. The primary current waveform should show a very clear “ramp-up” followed by a quick “ramp down” at the end of each interrupter cycle. This waveform is shown in Figure 59.

This is pretty much exactly what I would expect to see. Note that each division is 500mV which, considering we have a 1:1000 transformer, means that we are getting a peak current of about 100 amps. If you don’t see a waveform like the above, there are a number of things that could be the cause. The first (and I made this mistake myself) is that you are using a wire-wound resistor connected across the current transformer. Wire-wound resistors will likely behave differently from carbon resistors, and the waveform may not look as neat. It may not show any resemblance at all to the above waveform. Make sure you use carbon or metal film resistors across your CT for probing and for your over-current detection. Another potential cause for sloppy waveforms is noise induced on the line. Make sure your probe is well away from the bridge and GDTs when probing the primary current. Also make sure your probe isn’t touching anything it shouldn’t be, and furthermore, make sure no other probes are being used elsewhere in the circuit. Remember that their ground leads are connected together inside the scope. Anything you apply to one will also be seen on the other. One more possible cause for a waveform that does not resemble the one in Figure 59 is if you have a short somewhere on your bridge. I had this happen at first when a burr left over from drilling the heat sink got trapped between the collector tab of one of the IGBTs and the heat sink, puncturing the Kapton sheet and shorting it to the heat sink. Problems like this can usually be tracked down using the continuity setting on your multimeter when the coil is switched off. Neither of the bridge outputs should ever have continuity to the heat sink while the coil is not turned on. Note, do NOT test continuity while there is a voltage on the bus or while your driver or interrupter are turned on.

The next waveform we need to measure is the output from the bridge. This measurement is the one that really requires that the scope be isolated from mains ground, otherwise you could damage it. Also make sure that your scope, and your probes, can handle the voltages present on the bridge. Take all possible safety precautions to prevent personal harm and/or damage of property.

Once again, I start with a bus voltage of around 15VAC (21.2VDC) and the current limiter set to around 400A. What we expect to see across the output of the bridge is a square wave, and at the end of the interrupter cycle I expect to see it decay quickly as the primary current rings down. Figure 60 shows the waveform I got on my coil:

If we look more closely at the waveform it doesn’t look much like a square wave except at the beginning. After the first cycle it starts to slant upwards during the rising portion of the waveform. This “droop”, as it’s often referred to, can be due to a number of factors. One of the causes could be the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the bus capacitor, another could be a bus capacitance that is too low, and a third could be the position of my dummy load. Ideally my dummy load would be set within the innermost turn of the primary coil close to the copper tubing, but since the support is secured in place I simply set the MOT on top of the support. Proper planning could have prevented this issue and allowed placement of the load closer to the primary coil. Having the dummy load further away from the primary coil leads to excessive current draw relative to the applied bus voltage, which leads to “drooping” in the waveform.

While the bridge output waveform is not perfect, it should still work just fine. For future coils I plan to reduce the size of, or eliminate, the secondary support and find another way to secure the secondary coil in place. This will allow me to put a dummy load much closer to the primary, which would help reduce the droop seen in the waveform. I will also look for a different bus capacitor with a lower ESR and a higher capacitance to minimize the droop.

First Light

“First Light” is a term used to describe a Tesla coil’s first run with a high voltage output. It is the first run with the secondary placed within the primary coil. Since all the waveforms look pretty good, I’m comfortable firing it up.

I originally planned to test it for the first time outdoors, with a proper earth ground rod and everything. However, I decided that if I limit the bus voltage and keep the output low, connecting to mains ground should be sufficient. I placed the secondary over the form and connected the ground lead to the RF ground hookup I set up earlier. It is very important that your secondary coil be grounded, otherwise it will try to arc as well. One of the most common results in cases where the secondary is not properly grounded is a high voltage arc between the base of the secondary coil and the primary coil, which burns and destroys the lower windings of the coil. I have seen entire secondary coils destroyed because the operator forgot to hook up the ground lead.

I switched on the low-voltage power supply (which consists of a fuse, an 18VAC PCB-mount transformer, a bridge rectifier, two large filter capacitors from an old ATX power supply, an LM7805 and an LM7815 for the 5V and 15V rails respectively, two PCB-mount toggle switches (one for each rail), and an output connector. This board provides the power needed by the driver circuitry – 5V for the logic, and 15V for the drivers and OCD circuitry. For testing purposes I wrote a very simple Arduino sketch that provides a 220Hz square wave with a 5% duty cycle (more on why this was a bad idea later) to use as an interrupter. I used a cheap fiber-optic set I bought from Digikey to electrically isolate the interrupter and myself from the Tesla coil. I used a cheap transmitter (Industrial Fiberoptics part number IF-E96E), receiver (Industrial Fiberoptics part number IF-D92), and a 5 meter cable (Broadcom Limited part number HFBR-RNS005Z). The receiver, however, is a basic phototransistor which acts more like a valve rather than a switch. Since the Tesla coil requires a square wave output from the interrupter I needed to amplify the signal and convert it to a near-perfect square wave. I eventually added a 2N7000 MOSFET to the receiver circuit to ensure I got the output I needed. The circuit I used (originally simulated in LTSpice) is shown in figure 61:

R3 really isn’t necessary for this circuit, but it was already built onto my driver board (I used it to replace R3 shown in my driver schematic, because 1k was much too small) and I didn’t feel like removing it at the time. The 2N2222 transistor simply mimics the phototransistor used in the fiber-optic receiver. The downside to the above circuit is that the MOSFET conducts even when the interrupter is turned off. On my next rev of the driver I will be replacing the fiber optic phototransistor with one that has a TTL output, so I can eliminate all this extra circuitry. The above circuit will work for testing, however.

After I placed the secondary onto the form and hooked up the ground lead, connected the low voltage power supply, and set up the interrupter with the fiber optic connection, I was ready to go. I turned on my Variac, making sure the output was set to 0V, with the interrupter turned off. I then turned my interrupter on and slowly began to turn up the bus voltage. I began to hear some buzzing from the breakout point on the topload (a piece of wire I set on top) but at best I only saw about 1” sparks to the air. If I turned up the bus voltage beyond a certain level my over-current detector kicked in. This was the telltale sign that my coil was significantly out of tune, causing it to pull too much current and to have a very poor output.

Tuning

“Tuning” refers to the process of attempting to match the primary resonant frequency with the secondary resonant frequency. In order to determine the (rough) resonant frequency of my secondary, I set my function generator to supply a 10V peak-to-peak sine wave and connected the positive lead to the bottom lead of the secondary coil (RF ground). I left the negative lead dangling. I then set my scope probe up approximately 1.5 feet from the secondary coil in a fixed position (to prevent it from swaying). In order to determine the resonant frequency of my secondary circuit I started at the lowest frequency of my function generator and slowly increased it. At first nothing really showed up on my scope, but as I increased the frequency I started seeing a (somewhat sloppy) sine wave appearing on the scope. As I neared 100 kHz the amplitude and cleanliness of this sine wave increased dramatically (once again, the probe was not connected to anything) before starting to decrease again as I continued to increase the frequency on the function generator. The point at which the amplitude of the waveform on the scope is at its peak shows the resonant frequency of the secondary (measured by the scope). In my case this test suggested the resonant frequency was around 103 kHz. This is actually fairly close to my initial estimate of 127 kHz, because being in a small room, the secondary circuit’s capacitance is slightly higher than calculated which drops the resonant frequency. This means that in order to match this frequency I would need to “tune” my primary coil so that it, too, has a lower resonant frequency. Tuning can be done in two different ways: adjusting the primary tank capacitance or adjusting the primary coil inductance. I tend to think of it as coarse tuning and fine tuning, respectively. In order to reduce the resonant frequency I would either need to increase my primary capacitance (add capacitor strings in parallel with the existing MMC), or increase my primary inductance (tap my primary coil on one of the outer turns). I decided to move the tap to the last turn to see what effect it had on the output. When I did this I started getting some slightly larger streamers, as shown in Figure 62.

An 8-10 inch arc is better than 1 inch, but the coil was still clearly out of tune. Unfortunately I was out of primary turns to tap, so I decided to double up my capacitors. I originally had a single string of 16 2uF IGBT snubber capacitors (described earlier) which gave me a total capacitance of 125nF. I decided to make a second string of 16, which I connected in parallel with the first. This gave me the same voltage rating but twice the capacitance (250nF instead of only 125). This added capacitance reduces the resonant frequency of the primary coil, hopefully making it match the secondary circuit frequency more closely. After connecting the second string of capacitors in parallel with the first and moving the primary tap in a couple of turns, I was getting a much nicer output, shown in Figures 63-65.

Something that is worth noting is that the streamer itself actually adds capacitance to the secondary circuit, which lowers the resonant frequency even more. For this reason you may find that your primary resonant circuit should be “detuned” to a slightly lower frequency than the secondary to make sure they match. Calculations are great to get you moving in the right direction, but there is a point in the testing process that one must take a trial-and-error approach.

At this point I should mention that operating at this high of an input voltage without a proper earth ground rod and without shielding on the driver or interrupter circuitry was a very bad idea. At the end of the run imaged above, the voltage on the topload became so high that it began to break out at points other than the screwdriver (which I used to replace the wire breakout point I had previously used). This caused a misguided streamer to strike to the ground rail, and the interference caused my unshielded interrupter (the Arduino) to reset three times within the span of a second. On each of these resets the output pin of the Arduino (which was connected to the fiber optic emitter) went high for an extended period of time (much longer than the intended pulse width) which caused near continuous-wave operation (that is, no interruption) until the Arduino reset again. This led to three large, powerful bursts from the topload, shown in Figures 66-69.

The above images show the initial ground strike (Figure 66) followed by the three near-continuous-wave bursts (Figures 67-69). Continuous-wave operation puts tremendous strain on the transistors as it allows the coil to pull a significant amount of current, which can easily burn out the tiny TO-247 60N60 transistors I used. I was lucky that time, but the next time I ran the coil I wasn’t so fortunate.

I decided to take it up a level and see what the coil could do, so I shielded the driver circuitry (neglecting to shield the interrupter or take the coil outside and connect a ground rod) and fired it up again. I was getting about 2.5 or 3 foot arcs before I got another ground strike. This time, however, everything stopped dead and wouldn’t start again. After some troubleshooting I eventually found that a high-side and a low-side IGBT on one of the H-bridge boards were both completely shorted, preventing the coil from operating. It looks like for now, until I get more transistors in, this project is on hold.

Future Plans

1. New Driver

I have been working on a new revision of my driver that adds a few features like under-voltage lockout (prevents the coil from operating when there’s not enough drive voltage for the MOSFET drivers), a new fiber optic receiver with a TTL output, on-board voltage regulation, adjustable drive voltage, and various other minor changes.

2. New Bridge

TO-247 IGBTs may work ok for small coils, but they’re still pretty wimpy. Eventually I would like to upgrade to 60N60s in a SOT-227 package which should be able to handle more power due to their better heat-dissipative capabilities. This will require an entirely new bridge design. In the meantime I will probably switch to FGH60N60SMD IGBTs instead of –UFD because they have a higher power handling capability and a slightly faster switching ability. They also have the same pinout as the –UFD IGBTs (which I use now) so I would be able to reuse my bridge board if necessary.

3. Organization

At the moment all of the “guts” of my coil are simply placed on the shelf of my stand, with no real thought to troubleshooting or organization. I plan to eventually build a new stand (this time planning the position of all the components to ensure they’ll fit) and organize the parts in a way that minimizes the lead length.

4. MIDI Control

I plan to develop a MIDI recognition algorithm for a microcontroller that converts the MIDI signals to signals that can be used to interrupt the Tesla coil. With this interrupter it would be possible to make the Tesla coil play music through the arcs.

There are certainly more upgrades I would like to make, but they would probably constitute a whole new Tesla coil.

This has been the process of designing and building my “Vermonster Mini” dual-resonant solid-state Tesla coil, and hopefully provides a basic framework for designing your own small DRSSTC as well.